Justice Stevens was on the Supreme Court for 35 years.
Photo: David Hume Kennerly/Getty Images
He wasn’t a “stealth liberal” on the Court from the get-go, like David Souter; and he is not identified with a major decision that still makes conservatives howl, like Harry Blackmun, the author of the majority opinion in Roe v. Wade. Still, John Paul Stevens, who has died at the age of 99, became to conservatives something of the archetype of the liberal Trojan horse jurist over the course of his 35 years on the Supreme Court (the third-longest tenure in history). Appointed by Gerald Ford to SCOTUS in 1975, Stevens was eventually acknowledged as the leader of the liberal wing of the Court, and thus a living testament to the hypothesis that Republican presidents had (wittingly or unwittingly) betrayed The Cause by handing lifetime appointments to conservatism’s ideological enemies.
Now, you can certainly argue, as Jeffrey Toobin does in his obituary of Stevens, that this justice’s reputation for liberalism owes as much to the rightward trend in the composition of the Court — and for that matter, in the Republican Party — over the decades since his appointment. It’s certainly true that the ideological weight carried by particular issues that came before SCOTUS during Stevens’s tenure changed. His most famous opinion was probably the one he delivered in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council in 1984, establishing the right of federal agencies to interpret their own statutory powers. Over time, “Chevron deference” became something of a devil figure for conservatives, who accused the Court of enabling a permanent deep state of all-powerful bureaucrats bent on expanding government. Stevens was also perhaps the Court’s most adamant defender of the strict separation of church and state. But he joined SCOTUS at a time when the conservative Evangelicals who now are horrified by that doctrine were its staunchest supporters. Toward the end of his tenure, Stevens also shocked conservatives with his dismissal of gun rights in a dissenting opinion in D.C. v. Heller. That wasn’t a defining issue for Republicans or for conservatives back in the day.
Perhaps most important, John Paul Stevens was the first Supreme Court appointee after Roe established a constitutional right to an abortion. The subject did not even come up in his confirmation hearings, Linda Greenhouse tells us. Seventeen years later, when Roe had its biggest test (to date) in the Planned Parenthood v. Casey case, Stevens was one of five Republican-appointed justices who reaffirmed a woman’s basic right to choose. To the overwhelming majority of conservative activists and Republican politicians who view abortion rights as an abomination, this decision remains the greatest betrayal of all.
So Stevens and his long tenure help explain why conservatives have become so focused on judicial nominations, and why they love Donald Trump for giving them a viselike grip on the judicial selection process. When Stevens granted an interview to the Washington Post, in conjunction with the publication of his memoir earlier this year, he reiterated his opposition to gun rights. The Heritage Foundation’s Thomas Jipping concluded that Stevens’s career “shows why the conflict over the kind of judge a president appoints is so important.” The late justice himself was confirmed by a unanimous Senate vote. That won’t happen again anytime in the foreseeable future. People on both sides of the partisan and ideological barricades have come to understand the enormous stakes associated with the composition of the Supreme Court. John Paul Stevens showed you cannot judge a judge by any superficial measurements.
John Paul Stevens and a Legacy of Liberal Republican Judges
Promoted links by Taboola
No impeachment today, and none on the horizon
The House voted, 332-95, with 1 voting Present, to table Rep. Al Green’s impeachment resolution. That kills it, but Green got 29 more votes not to table it than he did in ‘18
Trump turns up the dial on Omar yet again
President Trump on Rep Ilhan Omar: “Apparently, she was married to her brother, but I know nothing about that…but a lot of people are saying that. She was married to her brother”
Kevin Spacey won’t face consequences in court
A criminal case against Kevin Spacey has been dismissed by a district attorney in Massachusetts whose main reason for dropping the case is because the accuser won’t testify.
A bad miss for Netflix
Netflix lost customers in the U.S. this past quarter. That’s the first time that’s happened since 2011, when the company separated its DVD-by-mail and streaming business.
Fact check: true
Bernie Sanders: “I have never met one person who loves their insurance company”
Is Steve King Finally Running Out of Money and Luck?
By Ed Kilgore
The old racist’s prospects for reelection don’t look great, but he has exceeded expectations before.
“Going back to where she came from,” an illustration by Tim O’Brien
Rand Paul picks some strange spots to pretend to care about spending
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Wednesday blocked an attempt by Democrats to pass an extension of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) tried to win the Senate’s consent to approve the House-passed bill, which would reauthorize funding until fiscal year 2090. The bill cleared the House in a 402-12 vote last week.
But Paul objected, pointing to the country’s growing debt and arguing that any new spending should be offset by cuts to other spending.
John Paul Stevens and the Legacy of Liberal Republican Judges
By Ed Kilgore
Stevens’s long career on the Court as the Republican-appointed leader of its liberal wing remains a cautionary tale for conservatives.
First Look Media Is Pivoting. But to What?
By Sarah Jones
The company recently shuttered two prestigious sites. Employees are worried about what comes next.
El Chapo Sentenced to Life in Prison, Likely Headed to ‘Alcatraz of the Rockies’
By Adam K. Raymond
The Feds aren’t taking any chances with the known escape artist and will likely send him to a supermax prison in Colorado.
Rand Paul to the rescue
Over a round of golf this past weekend, Sen. Rand Paul asked President Donald Trump’s blessing for a sensitive diplomatic mission.
Paul proposed sitting down with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif to extend a fresh olive branch on the president’s behalf, according to four U.S. officials. The aim: to reduce tensions between the two countries. Trump signed off on the idea.
With Zarif in New York City this week for U.N. meetings and private sitdowns with journalists and think-tank experts, the prospect of the dovish Kentucky senator serving as the administration’s chief diplomatic emissary has rankled many administration officials, who are expressing concern that Paul’s intervention threatens to scuttle the president’s “maximum pressure” campaign against Tehran.
Polls: Voters Are Cool With Trump’s Deportation Raids, But Not His Racist Tweets
By Eric Levitz
New survey data suggests overt racism is a loser for the president, but rounding up and deporting thousands of immigrants might not be.
the national interest
the national interest
Republican: ‘I Believe Calling the President a Racist Is Personally Offensive’
By Jonathan Chait
A party credo takes hold.
Will anything we didn’t know come out now?
Political cartoon of the day
As expected, El Chapo gets hefty sentence
A federal judge sentenced Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman to life in prison plus 30 years.
This should be a spectacle
Rep. Al Green says the US House will vote between 4:30-5 p.m. ET today on his articles of impeachment for President Trump; it remains unclear if Democratic leadership will move to vote to table the resolution, vote to send to cmte. or vote to proceed with the resolution.
This explanation for a slow-and-steady approach is unlikely to satisfy liberals who want Dems to hurry up
House Democrats have kicked and screamed about the White House’s refusal to allow key Trump officials to come before Congress. But they haven’t done the one thing they can do to force the issue: Go to court.
Democrats have handed out procedural slaps on the wrist — from subpoenas to contempt citations — and all have been summarily blown off by a White House claiming “absolute immunity” from congressional testimony.
The seeming lack of results has fueled criticism among progressive lawmakers and activists. But there are real reasons for the go-slow approach: An overstretched team of House lawyers along with Democrats’ fear of an adverse court ruling that could have long-lasting ramifications.
Trump’s attacks on “the squad” aren’t going over well with the American public
A clear majority of Americans say President Trump’s tweets targeting four minority congresswomen were “un-American,” according to a new USA TODAY/Ipsos Poll. But most Republicans say they agreed with his comments, an illustration of the nation’s sharp partisan divide on issues of patriotism and race.
More than two-thirds of those aware of the controversy, 68%, called Trump’s tweets offensive. Among Republicans alone, however, 57% said they agreed with tweets that told the congresswomen to go back to their “original” countries, and a third “strongly” agreed with them. All four lawmakers are American citizens; three were born in the United States.
That finding may help explain the reluctance of GOP leaders and most GOP members of Congress to castigate the president for tweets and comments in recent days targeting the congresswomen, outspoken progressives who are among his sharpest critics on Capitol Hill. Only four Republicans joined House Democrats Tuesday in passing a resolution condemning Trump’s comments as “racist.”
A top tier has solidified (for now) in California’s primary
P2020 CALIFORNIA DEM (Quinnipiac): Harris 23%, Biden 21%, Sanders 18%, Warren 16%, Buttigieg 3%, Yang 2% … all others at 1% or less apiece
Trump’s ‘Love It Or Leave It’ Jingoism Was Predictable All Along
By Ed Kilgore
Ross Douthat’s suggestion that Trump perverted an initially healthy skepticism about American virtue misses the authoritarian impulses he represents.
The House Rule That Sent the Chamber Into Chaos on Tuesday
By Matt Stieb
The House fell into nearly two hours of delay and debate when Nancy Pelosi called Trump’s language “racist,” violating a precedent from 1984.
Justice Stevens has reportedly died at the age of 99
Oregon Republicans Aim to Recall Democratic Governor Over Climate Change Plans
By Ed Kilgore
After their legislators left the state to thwart a cap-and-trade bill, Republicans want to depose Brown for threatening executive action on emissions.
The take everyone needed today
You know, they talk about people of color. I’m a person of color. I’m white. I’m an Anglo Saxon. People say things all the time. But I don’t get offended.
Will Trump’s Racist Tweets Work?
By Jonathan Chait, Benjamin Hart, and Margaret Hartmann
They’re morally indefensible. Are they politically indefensible, too?
follow the money
follow the money
How Jeffrey Epstein Lost $80 Million in a Hedge-Fund Bet Gone Bad
By Michelle Celarier
He took investment advice from a Wall Street friend, and came out on the wrong end of an accounting scandal featuring a dodgy Gulfstream jet purchase.