John Paul Stevens and the Legacy of Liberal Republican Judges

Justice Stevens was on the Supreme Court for 35 years.
Photo: David Hume Kennerly/Getty Images

He wasn’t a “stealth liberal” on the Court from the get-go, like David Souter; and he is not identified with a major decision that still makes conservatives howl, like Harry Blackmun, the author of the majority opinion in Roe v. Wade. Still, John Paul Stevens, who has died at the age of 99, became to conservatives something of the archetype of the liberal Trojan horse jurist over the course of his 35 years on the Supreme Court (the third-longest tenure in history). Appointed by Gerald Ford to SCOTUS in 1975, Stevens was eventually acknowledged as the leader of the liberal wing of the Court, and thus a living testament to the hypothesis that Republican presidents had (wittingly or unwittingly) betrayed The Cause by handing lifetime appointments to conservatism’s ideological enemies.

Now, you can certainly argue, as Jeffrey Toobin does in his obituary of Stevens, that this justice’s reputation for liberalism owes as much to the rightward trend in the composition of the Court — and for that matter, in the Republican Party — over the decades since his appointment. It’s certainly true that the ideological weight carried by particular issues that came before SCOTUS during Stevens’s tenure changed. His most famous opinion was probably the one he delivered in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council in 1984, establishing the right of federal agencies to interpret their own statutory powers. Over time, “Chevron deference” became something of a devil figure for conservatives, who accused the Court of enabling a permanent deep state of all-powerful bureaucrats bent on expanding government. Stevens was also perhaps the Court’s most adamant defender of the strict separation of church and state. But he joined SCOTUS at a time when the conservative Evangelicals who now are horrified by that doctrine were its staunchest supporters. Toward the end of his tenure, Stevens also shocked conservatives with his dismissal of gun rights in a dissenting opinion in D.C. v. Heller. That wasn’t a defining issue for Republicans or for conservatives back in the day.

Perhaps most important, John Paul Stevens was the first Supreme Court appointee after Roe established a constitutional right to an abortion. The subject did not even come up in his confirmation hearings, Linda Greenhouse tells us. Seventeen years later, when Roe had its biggest test (to date) in the Planned Parenthood v. Casey case, Stevens was one of five Republican-appointed justices who reaffirmed a woman’s basic right to choose. To the overwhelming majority of conservative activists and Republican politicians who view abortion rights as an abomination, this decision remains the greatest betrayal of all.

So Stevens and his long tenure help explain why conservatives have become so focused on judicial nominations, and why they love Donald Trump for giving them a viselike grip on the judicial selection process. When Stevens granted an interview to the Washington Post, in conjunction with the publication of his memoir earlier this year, he reiterated his opposition to gun rights. The Heritage Foundation’s Thomas Jipping concluded that Stevens’s career “shows why the conflict over the kind of judge a president appoints is so important.” The late justice himself was confirmed by a unanimous Senate vote. That won’t happen again anytime in the foreseeable future. People on both sides of the partisan and ideological barricades have come to understand the enormous stakes associated with the composition of the Supreme Court. John Paul Stevens showed you cannot judge a judge by any superficial measurements.

John Paul Stevens and a Legacy of Liberal Republican Judges

Promoted links by Taboola

No impeachment today, and none on the horizon

The House voted, 332-95, with 1 voting Present, to table Rep. Al Green’s impeachment resolution. That kills it, but Green got 29 more votes not to table it than he did in ‘18


Trump turns up the dial on Omar yet again

President Trump on Rep Ilhan Omar: “Apparently, she was married to her brother, but I know nothing about that…but a lot of people are saying that. She was married to her brother”


Kevin Spacey won’t face consequences in court

A criminal case against Kevin Spacey has been dismissed by a district attorney in Massachusetts whose main reason for dropping the case is because the accuser won’t testify.


A bad miss for Netflix

Netflix lost customers in the U.S. this past quarter. That’s the first time that’s happened since 2011, when the company separated its DVD-by-mail and streaming business.


Fact check: true

Bernie Sanders: “I have never met one person who loves their insurance company”


2020 elections

Is Steve King Finally Running Out of Money and Luck?

By Ed Kilgore

The old racist’s prospects for reelection don’t look great, but he has exceeded expectations before.

“Going back to where she came from,” an illustration by Tim O’Brien

Rand Paul picks some strange spots to pretend to care about spending

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Wednesday blocked an attempt by Democrats to pass an extension of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. 

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) tried to win the Senate’s consent to approve the House-passed bill, which would reauthorize funding until fiscal year 2090. The bill cleared the House in a 402-12 vote last week. 

But Paul objected, pointing to the country’s growing debt and arguing that any new spending should be offset by cuts to other spending. 

supreme court

John Paul Stevens and the Legacy of Liberal Republican Judges

By Ed Kilgore

Stevens’s long career on the Court as the Republican-appointed leader of its liberal wing remains a cautionary tale for conservatives.


First Look Media Is Pivoting. But to What?

By Sarah Jones

The company recently shuttered two prestigious sites. Employees are worried about what comes next.

el chapo

El Chapo Sentenced to Life in Prison, Likely Headed to ‘Alcatraz of the Rockies’

By Adam K. Raymond

The Feds aren’t taking any chances with the known escape artist and will likely send him to a supermax prison in Colorado.

Rand Paul to the rescue

Over a round of golf this past weekend, Sen. Rand Paul asked President Donald Trump’s blessing for a sensitive diplomatic mission.

Paul proposed sitting down with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif to extend a fresh olive branch on the president’s behalf, according to four U.S. officials. The aim: to reduce tensions between the two countries. Trump signed off on the idea.

With Zarif in New York City this week for U.N. meetings and private sitdowns with journalists and think-tank experts, the prospect of the dovish Kentucky senator serving as the administration’s chief diplomatic emissary has rankled many administration officials, who are expressing concern that Paul’s intervention threatens to scuttle the president’s “maximum pressure” campaign against Tehran.

Infinite Pinocchios

Eric Trump claimed that “95%” of people in the U.S. support his father’s political message even as President Trump has worked to beat back criticism of racist language he leveled against members of Congress



Polls: Voters Are Cool With Trump’s Deportation Raids, But Not His Racist Tweets

By Eric Levitz

New survey data suggests overt racism is a loser for the president, but rounding up and deporting thousands of immigrants might not be.

the national interest

the national interest

Republican: ‘I Believe Calling the President a Racist Is Personally Offensive’

By Jonathan Chait

A party credo takes hold.

Will anything we didn’t know come out now?

NEW: Federal judge issues order that investigators and prosecutors have concluded review of campaign finance violations involving former Trump fixer Michael Cohen, and sections of search warrants that have to do with that investigation can be redacted and unsealed – @Tom_Winter


Political cartoon of the day

As expected, El Chapo gets hefty sentence

A federal judge sentenced Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman to life in prison plus 30 years.


This should be a spectacle

Rep. Al Green says the US House will vote between 4:30-5 p.m. ET today on his articles of impeachment for President Trump; it remains unclear if Democratic leadership will move to vote to table the resolution, vote to send to cmte. or vote to proceed with the resolution.


This explanation for a slow-and-steady approach is unlikely to satisfy liberals who want Dems to hurry up

House Democrats have kicked and screamed about the White House’s refusal to allow key Trump officials to come before Congress. But they haven’t done the one thing they can do to force the issue: Go to court.

Democrats have handed out procedural slaps on the wrist — from subpoenas to contempt citations — and all have been summarily blown off by a White House claiming “absolute immunity” from congressional testimony.

The seeming lack of results has fueled criticism among progressive lawmakers and activists. But there are real reasons for the go-slow approach: An overstretched team of House lawyers along with Democrats’ fear of an adverse court ruling that could have long-lasting ramifications.

Trump’s attacks on “the squad” aren’t going over well with the American public

A clear majority of Americans say President Trump’s tweets targeting four minority congresswomen were “un-American,” according to a new USA TODAY/Ipsos Poll. But most Republicans say they agreed with his comments, an illustration of the nation’s sharp partisan divide on issues of patriotism and race. 

More than two-thirds of those aware of the controversy, 68%, called Trump’s tweets offensive. Among Republicans alone, however, 57% said they agreed with tweets that told the congresswomen to go back to their “original” countries, and a third “strongly” agreed with them. All four lawmakers are American citizens; three were born in the United States.

That finding may help explain the reluctance of GOP leaders and most GOP members of Congress to castigate the president for tweets and comments in recent days targeting the congresswomen, outspoken progressives who are among his sharpest critics on Capitol Hill. Only four Republicans joined House Democrats Tuesday in passing a resolution condemning Trump’s comments as “racist.”  

A top tier has solidified (for now) in California’s primary

P2020 CALIFORNIA DEM (Quinnipiac): Harris 23%, Biden 21%, Sanders 18%, Warren 16%, Buttigieg 3%, Yang 2% … all others at 1% or less apiece


donald trump

Trump’s ‘Love It Or Leave It’ Jingoism Was Predictable All Along

By Ed Kilgore

Ross Douthat’s suggestion that Trump perverted an initially healthy skepticism about American virtue misses the authoritarian impulses he represents.


The House Rule That Sent the Chamber Into Chaos on Tuesday

By Matt Stieb

The House fell into nearly two hours of delay and debate when Nancy Pelosi called Trump’s language “racist,” violating a precedent from 1984.

Justice Stevens has reportedly died at the age of 99

Saw Babe Ruth call his shot. Worked on the Navy team that tracked down Yamamoto. Served on the court for 35 years. What a life.


gubernatorial recall

gubernatorial recall

Oregon Republicans Aim to Recall Democratic Governor Over Climate Change Plans

By Ed Kilgore

After their legislators left the state to thwart a cap-and-trade bill, Republicans want to depose Brown for threatening executive action on emissions.

The take everyone needed today

You know, they talk about people of color. I’m a person of color. I’m white. I’m an Anglo Saxon. People say things all the time. But I don’t get offended.

Pennsylvania GOP Rep. Mike Kelly

intelligencer chats

intelligencer chats

Will Trump’s Racist Tweets Work?

By Jonathan Chait, Benjamin Hart, and Margaret Hartmann

They’re morally indefensible. Are they politically indefensible, too?

follow the money

follow the money

How Jeffrey Epstein Lost $80 Million in a Hedge-Fund Bet Gone Bad

By Michelle Celarier

He took investment advice from a Wall Street friend, and came out on the wrong end of an accounting scandal featuring a dodgy Gulfstream jet purchase.

Read More


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: