Smoke rises from the site of an attack after a massive explosion the night before near the Green Village in Kabul on September 3, 2019. The Taliban attack killed at least 16 people.
Photo: Wakil Kohsar/AFP/Getty Images
On Saturday evening, just days before the 18th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks which led to America’s forever war in Afghanistan, President Trump revealed in a series of tweets that he had canceled a secret Sunday summit with Taliban and Afghan leaders at Camp David. The reason, he claimed, was that the Taliban had admitted to killing an American soldier and 11 others in a suicide bombing last week in order “to build false leverage” in its peace negotiations with the U.S.
“What kind of people would kill so many in order to seemingly strengthen their bargaining position? They didn’t, they only made it worse,” the president declared.
But speaking of making things worse, the New York Times reported on Sunday that the president’s announcement was hardly the whole story. The Camp David meeting — according to Afghan, Taliban, and Western officials — was actually a failed gamble by the Trump administration. The summit, which the Trump team proposed late last month, was an attempt rush a conclusion to the negotiations by flying Taliban and Afghan leaders to the U.S. so that the parties could iron out the remaining details and conclude with a big peace-deal announcement and photo op.
U.S. and Taliban negotiators have reportedly made real progress in nine rounds of talks over the last year, suggesting America’s 18-year war in Afghanistan may finally soon be over. But finalizing the end of an almost two-decade war is not like finishing the production of a television-show season. Though Afghan President Ashraf Ghani — who is facing reelection at the end of month and had been mostly excluded from the talks — had agreed to the summit, Taliban leaders objected to the plan. They insisted that they would not meet directly with the Afghan government or travel to America until after the deal with the U.S. had been finalized. That didn’t happen, so the hastily arranged summit was scrapped and the Taliban was blamed.
But even if the summit had happened, it still wasn’t clear to Afghan leaders how the meeting and final negotiations would have played out, according to the Times. That means it’s entirely possible the Trump administration, unable to close the peace deal, planned to wing it and hope the summit led to a big, popular finish. That would be the strategy most consistent with President Trump’s track record of impulsive, spectacle-over-substance foreign-policy decisions. Trump, who promised to end the war during his campaign, has now gotten more involved in the negotiations, but whether that hurts or helps matters remains to be seen — and it certainly hasn’t gone well in other foreign arenas.
America’s top peace envoy, Zalmay Khalilzad, recently announced that the U.S. and Taliban had reached an “agreement in principle” over the U.S. exit from the war. Roughly 14,000 U.S. troops remain deployed in the country, and the draft deal would have entailed them leaving over a 16-month period. About 5,400 U.S. troops would be withdrawn by the spring of next year, leaving another 8,600 to support Afghan troops until the Taliban’s compliance with the agreement could be confirmed. In exchange, the Taliban would agree to enter immediate peace talks with the Afghan government and prevent ISIS, Al Qaeda, or any other terrorist group from operating out of their territory.
But as the U.S. came close to announcing the deal, there were signs it was falling apart. NBC News reported on Thursday that Afghan leaders balked at the proposed agreement, which they had no part in negotiating. In particular, the Afghans have been worried that the quick U.S. drawdown would just lead to more Taliban attacks — and the Taliban has been exacerbating those fears by ramping up the violence while peace negotiations were taking place. U.S. officials had hoped that the tentative deal would prompt the Taliban to cease hostilities, but that didn’t happen. In addition to two suicide attacks last week in Kabul, the militant group launched offensives in three other parts of the country, and kidnapped six Afghan journalists on Friday.
On Saturday, a senior U.S. military leader in Afghanistan warned that the Taliban’s recent attacks were “particularly unhelpful at this moment in Afghanistan’s history.”
“Peace with a group that is still killing innocent people is meaningless,” President Ghani explained last week, and that statement was ultimately echoed by President Trump on Saturday. “If the Taliban could not maintain a ceasefire and were willing to kill innocent civilians during negotiations,” Trump said in his tweets, “then they probably don’t have the power to negotiate a meaningful agreement anyway.” Afghan leaders cited the Taliban attacks again on Sunday to justify the cancellation of the Camp David summit and to celebrate the cessation of peace negotiations.
Another sticky issue is when and how thousands of Taliban fighters will be released from Afghan jails — with Afghan leaders understandably concerned that those fighters would quickly join the ongoing Taliban offensive. The militant Islamist elephant in the room, critics of the peace negotiations argue, is that regardless of what the Taliban agree to, there is little reason to believe they won’t inevitably try to take over the country again once U.S. troops are gone.
It is not clear what the next step will be for the peace talks. President Trump suggested in his tweets that there would be no additional negotiations unless the Taliban commit to and follow through on a ceasefire. On Sunday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo confirmed that negotiations with the Taliban had indeed been halted, but that all of that could change in a day or two, depending on how Trump perceives the fallout.
At the very least, the negotiations between the U.S. and Taliban have now led to the Trump-calling-things-off-on-Twitter phase, which is arguably a sign of progress. Then again, Trump’s bluster-centric style of diplomacy has repeatedly failed to produce actual diplomacy, let alone substantive deals. And considering the fact that the Taliban have been fighting almost nonstop since the Soviet occupation, they probably won’t be influenced by anything Donald Trump says on Twitter — or at least not in way the president imagined, as Jason Lyall, the director of Dartmouth’s Political Violence FieldLab, explained in the Washington Post on Sunday:
The decision to cancel the summit publicly calls into question U.S. credibility, while also weakening pro-peace factions within the Taliban. This turnabout also shows how U.S. leverage over the Afghan government is dwindling, with the promise of Camp David not enough to persuade Ghani to swallow his concerns. The threat of a governmental collapse and outright Taliban victory has provided Kabul with a significant bargaining chip, if perhaps its only one, over its retreating American ally. Bottom line: Trump’s tweets may have made peace even harder to obtain.
Either way, last week’s deadly suicide bombing was not some final straw for Trump, as he and Pompeo have claimed, but rather a politically palatable excuse to save face after the administration’s plan for a peacemaking grand finale fell apart. The Taliban never agreed to a ceasefire, and violence is the only leverage the militants have. They have launched numerous deadly attacks on coalition forces and Afghan civilians while the peace negotiations have been underway. Those attacks didn’t derail the process before, and coalition forces have reportedly increased their activity against the Taliban at the same time. The war may be finally nearing an end, but there will definitely be more bloodshed before it does.
On Twitter, Trump cited the death of a U.S. service member as part of his justification for canceling the summit. That American was U.S. Army Sergeant 1st Class Elis A. Barreto Ortiz, a 34-year-old father of three from Puerto Rico who was serving his third tour in Afghanistan. He died after he was wounded in a Taliban suicide bombing near an Afghan intelligence office in Kabul on Thursday. The attack, one of two deadly suicide bombings launched by the Taliban in Kabul over the past week, also killed ten civilians and another NATO service member from Romania.
Barreto Ortiz was the 16th U.S. service member to be killed in the war this year. All told, more than 2,400 U.S. military personnel have been killed and more than 20,000 wounded during the longest war in American history, not to mention the countless Afghan and Pakistani civilians who have been killed or injured amid the fighting. For now, it seems certain that the conflict will continue into its 19th year next month.
This post has been updated throughout to reflect new details about the cancelled summit.
Trump’s Taliban Meeting Was Failed Effort to Rush Peace Deal
Promoted links by Taboola
Payments From Air Force Stopovers May Have Kept Trump Turnberry Afloat
By Matt Stieb
The Air Force has spent $11 million at a small airport vital to Trump Turnberry, and has required servicemembers to stay at his Scottish hotel.
Beto O’Rourke Tries on Urgency for Size
By Gabriel Debenedetti
The Texas Democrat has had trouble connecting with voters. Will dire warnings about Trump and a lot more F-bombs bridge the gap?
Interesting trends for Warren as the field of candidates narrows and Democratic voters shift their support
From Sunday’s release of CBS News/YouGov Tracker data:
State by state in vote preference, New Hampshire now sees Warren just slightly up over Biden and Sanders in first-choice preference there, effectively making the primary there a three-way contest. Biden holds onto a small edge over Sanders in first-choice preference in Iowa to go with that still-sizable advantage in South Carolina. Meanwhile, Sanders has a narrow edge over Biden in Nevada.
Biden’s support has largely held and even risen in some places like in Iowa, so the movement toward Warren is not attrition from Biden, but of lower-tier candidates losing supporters who have gone to Warren or, in lesser numbers, to Sanders. … Warren is also under consideration by more Democrats (60%) than Biden is (50%) — suggesting her campaign could have even more room to gain.
Biden does better than Warren in being named the first choice among those currently considering him. For Warren, among those voters not currently picking her as their first choice now, almost half (47%) are nonetheless considering her, so she may have potential room to increase her standing if she can convert those voters.
And more Democrats now believe Warren can defeat Trump:
About three in four of those considering Biden think he probably would beat President Trump, similar to last month, but still a higher number for Biden than for the other top three candidates. But Warren has made strong gains on electability. Among those considering supporting her, the percentage who think she would probably beat Mr. Trump has jumped 16 points since June, from 39% then to 55% now.
Steyer’s October surprise
On the eve of the 18th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks, the current FDNY Academy class, set to graduate in two weeks, includes 13 members — 12 men and one woman — whose firefighter fathers were murdered on 9/11, The Post has learned.
The class includes siblings — two sons of one fallen firefighter, and the son and daughter of another hero.
The historic group of at least 16 “legacy” probationary firefighters also includes the son of an NYPD officer killed on 9/11, and the sons of two firefighters who died due to illness linked to their rescue and recovery work at Ground Zero.
This FDNY class has the most “legacy” members since 9/11, though dozens of other sons — and one daughter — have previously joined the force, said spokesman Jim Long.
“Bravery runs in these extraordinary families who have sacrificed so much for our city. I’m proud of the commitment these probies have already demonstrated to the department and look forward to celebrating with them at their graduation,” Fire Commissioner Daniel Nigro told The Post.
No pressure, Lord Barron
President Donald Trump’s campaign manager predicted Saturday that the president and his family will become “a dynasty that will last for decades,” transforming the Republican Party while hewing to conservative values.
Speaking to a convention of Republican Party delegates in Indian Wells, California, Brad Parscale also said the campaign’s goal is to build a national army of 2 million trained volunteers, far beyond the president’s 2016 organization, that in California could help the GOP retake a string of U.S. House seats captured by Democrats last year.
“The Trumps will be a dynasty that will last for decades, propelling the Republican Party into a new party,” he said. “One that will adapt to changing cultures. One must continue to adapt while keeping the conservative values that we believe in.”
Facing monumental longshot odds in a fractured Republican Party, former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford this morning formally announced his bid to challenge President Donald Trump for the White House.
The announcement came during a nationally televised appearance on “Fox News Sunday,” a conservative-leaning news program Trump is known to watch regularly.
The former Charleston congressman has been privately considering a presidential bid since he left office in January and has been publicly exploring its viability for the last 54 days. He is basing his run on a warning that the Republican Party is at an “inflection point” after three years of the Trump presidency, though he is making attention to the ballooning national debt his focal point.
war in afghanistan
war in afghanistan
Trump’s Canceled Meeting With Taliban Was a Failed Attempt to Rush a Peace Deal
By Chas Danner
The Camp David summit was reportedly a last-minute ploy to conclude negotiations and let Trump deliver a grand finale to the war in Afghanistan.
Trump Won’t Rest Until We Accept His Sharpie-Doctored Hurricane Map
By Matt Stieb, Margaret Hartmann, and Chas Danner
The president suggested on Saturday that we wants to put down the Sharpie, but the media won’t let him.
What the ‘Ahmari-French Debate’ Was Really About
By J. Oliver Conroy
A wonky debate turned into an ugly clash between two visions of conservatism.
If Not Snapchat, What? A Guide to Stanford’s Non-Tech Fiefdoms
By Andrew Granato
Stanford is known for producing the tech industry’s elite class. But it’s also a good place for becoming a Master of the Universe in other arenas.
the national interest
the national interest
Eric Trump Encounters Journalism, Is Confused
By Jonathan Chait
How dare the Washington Post offer to speak with sources in our organization?
the top line
Is There a Recession Coming? Ask Again Later
By Josh Barro
In the latest economic data, there’s fodder for the optimists and the pessimists alike.
More scary news on vaping deaths
Federal health authorities are urging people to stop using electronic smoking products while they investigate the death of a third person from a mysterious vaping illness that researchers say may have affected 450 people around the U.S.
“While the investigation is ongoing, people should consider not using e-cigarette products,” the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in a news release. The agency also said people should stop buying e-cigarette products off the street or modifying products bought legally.
… A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention spokesman said it is investigating 450 cases in 33 states and one U.S. territory, suggesting the number of reports of cases has more than doubled since the agency updated its investigation last week.
Apple Downplays Enormous iOS Security Hole Found by Google
By Brian Feldman
The company issued a rare response to disclosures Google made last week.
Ted Cruz’s Dishonest Rhetoric About Chicago
By Zak Cheney-Rice
The senator’s attempt to use Chicago to make a point about gun control is the conservative tradition of using the city as a political football.
ThinkProgress is no more
ThinkProgress, the influential news site that rose to prominence in the shadow of the Bush administration and helped define progressivism during the Obama years, is shutting down.
The outlet, which served as an editorially independent project of the Democratic Party think tank Center for American Progress, will stop current operations on Friday and be converted into a site where CAP scholars can post. Top officials at CAP had been searching for a buyer to take over ThinkProgress, which has run deficits for years, and according to sources there were potentially three serious buyers in the mix recently. But in a statement to staff, Navin Nayak, the executive director of the Center for American Progress Action Fund, said the site was ultimately unable to secure a patron.
The latest move in the Trump administration’s effort to keep out refugees
The White House is considering a plan that would effectively bar refugees from most parts of the world from resettling in the United States by cutting back the decades-old program that admits tens of thousands of people each year who are fleeing war, persecution and famine, according to current and former administration officials.
In meetings over the past several weeks, one top administration official has proposed zeroing out the program altogether, while leaving the president with the ability to admit refugees in an emergency. Another option that top officials are weighing would cut refugee admissions by half or more, to 10,000 to 15,000 people, but reserve most of those spots for refugees from a few handpicked countries or groups with special status, such as Iraqis and Afghans who work alongside American troops, diplomats and intelligence operatives abroad.
Both options would all but end the United States’ status as one of the leading places accepting refugees from around the world.
Trump Fears Alienating His Base With Gun Reforms. That’s Irrational.
By Eric Levitz
The president backed off background checks for fear of displeasing his core supporters. But he can’t win reelection on their votes alone.
Mayor Pete is using some of his massive fundraising haul to boost his numbers in Iowa
Pete Buttigieg began a TV blitz in Iowa on Friday, starting his first serious paid advertising effort in the first caucus state.
Buttigieg’s new ad, which is running on TV and digital platforms, leans into his biography as a veteran and a mayor. In a 30-second voice-over, the South Bend, Ind., mayor says that in “today’s divided America, we’re at each other’s throats.”
… This week, Buttigieg crisscrossed Iowa to open 20 new field offices, and he has added another 30 on-the-ground staffers, bringing him to more than 100 organizers in the state. The campaign also opened 12 new field offices in New Hampshire this week.
the national circus
the national circus
Frank Rich: Sharpiegate and Trump’s Escalating War on Reality
By Frank Rich
There’s been an uptick in lunacy since recession fears crept onto Trump’s radar — and his delusional claims will only get worse as 2020 approaches.
Amy McGrath Is Wasting Her Chance to Beat Mitch McConnell
By Sarah Jones
The former fighter pilot and Kentucky Democrat wants to take down Mitch McConnell. But she can’t stop getting into her own way.
Why Boris Johnson’s Awful Start Could Still End in Tory Triumph and Hard Brexit
By Andrew Sullivan
Even with all the questionable moves, he still has a lot of political advantages over his opponents.
the national interest
the national interest
Democrats Need to Plan Right Now for Republican Fiscal Sabotage
By Jonathan Chait
Lock in stimulus for the next recession while Republicans are still interested in stopping recessions.
Everything We Know About Hurricane Dorian
By Chas Danner, Matt Stieb, and Adam K. Raymond
After devastating the Bahamas, the Category 2 storm is moving up the East Coast, pounding the Carolinas with heavy rain and strong winds.
Howard Schultz Reminds Nation He Was Running for President by Dropping Out
By Nikita Richardson
The former Starbucks CEO won’t seek the Independent nomination after all.
the top line
Walmart’s Gun Decision Is Less Political Than It Looks
By Josh Barro
It’s about perceptions of safety by customers and employees. But it also underlines how much gun-rights activists have overstepped.
Three states are canceling their GOP primaries just to avoid potential embarrassment for Trump
Four states are poised to cancel their 2020 GOP presidential primaries and caucuses, a move that would cut off oxygen to Donald Trump’s long-shot primary challengers.
Republican parties in South Carolina, Nevada, Arizona and Kansas are expected to finalize the cancellations in meetings this weekend, according to three GOP officials who are familiar with the plans.